![]() ![]() Ut latine loqui aut cogitare experimentum autores classices imitari non commendabilium est. Ars autores classices legenda constituit, modus vero efficiens facultatem obtinendam latine loqui certe non fuit. Modus vetus scilicet non tantum stultus fuit - sed pars eloquentiam obtinenda de modo "legendo - vertendo" defuit. Sed nunc video quod cito verba latina mihi revertantur ac etiam sentio quod latine cogitare mihi facilitus sit quam expectavi. Post hoc semper dixi modum iste miserrimum esse quia de Ciceronem ad nihilem legendum citissimo deterioratus sum. ![]() Uterque praeceptor modum decendum "legendum - vertendum" applicavit. Postea cognitiones meas de latine extendi lectionibus. In schola 15-16 annos natus primum latinam accepi (se non annumeramus tentationes meas nomines animalis interpretari). Quaero silentiam rumpere et de disciplina latina aliquid afferre. Pax facta est - sed etiam silentia facta est. Nunc Zerothinking satis de Roncy castigatus est effrenatae suae audaciae declarandae quod non necesse sit autores classices legere, etiam satis vituperatus est propter imprudentiam suam ponendi parvitam meam quidem ullo de linguae latinae scire - quamquam clare omnibus est quod ego nihil omnino scio. Message 15 of 7004 November 2008 at 3:12pm | IP Logged Rest assured I won't get at you ever again. You have now proved not to be burdened with a shackled mind, as you seemed to be. Sorry I thought you were an idiot, my mistake but, as they say, to err is human. If you go on thinking things over you'll do well and will strengthen your thinking powers. Bono animo esto, non iam tibi insectabor. Verbis tuis recentissimis demonstavisti te non, ut mihi adhuc videbaris, hebeti ingenio esse. Mea culpa sed errare, ut aiunt, humanum est. Veniam da mihi qui stultum te esse putavi. Si melius cogitare perrexeris, bene tibi eveniet et maior facultas cogitandi/philosophandi tibi erit. Message 14 of 7029 October 2008 at 10:17am | IP Logged Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan I understand now that it's not all about the entertainment value with literature and that's not why they are always hailed and read so voraciouslly.Įdited by zerothinking on 29 October 2008 at 2:05am I hadn't seen the other benefits that some other people in the forum described to me that literature brings. I used the word 'seems' and I was also talking about it's ability to entertain me. I was never bashing old literature per se. I don't think you understand what I meant in the other post or what I was asking and trying to express. ![]() But I can't help but think that your 'helping' me is really a sort of attack on me for my views. I appreciate your enthusiasm and helping me. Or to read old literature in Latin, which as you know I don't find attractive enough to learn Latin. To understand where many words come from in many languages including English because that 'floats your boat'. To learn the romance language family inside out. Latin is pretty interesting but I wouldn't learn it. I never said a language was inferior if it was old, that's twisting my view of stories and their ability to interest me. I felt they were inferior but I've changed my mind a little bit. "Old" stories and such seem not to interest me. Maybe it's the reputation people give Latin and the fact I thought barely anyone could even formulate sentence in it anymore. From my point of view it seemed, well, very good for Latin. Abi cubitum, sine crustulis, tibi hodie non dantur cum puer male educatus sis. Omnia quae in hoc foro scribis stulta sunt: nulla nisi recentissima tibi utilia esse videntur, omnia cetera parvi momenti. "Old" doesn't interest you, you find it "inferior", your own words, remember. How dare you make such a sweeping judgement as you know no Latin. Message 12 of 7029 October 2008 at 2:01am | IP Logged Studies: Latin, Italian, Spanish, Japanese Etiam Wikipediam Latinam habimus quamquam minuscula est.Įdited by Iversen on 06 November 2008 at 3:16am Quod possibile est latine cotidiane de factis coditidianis scribere videmur ex iste ephemeride cum annuntibus latinis. Gaudium mihi magnum est gentem videre hic latine scribere. If I can make a total nauseating mess superficially look like proper Latin then I'm on the right track) ![]() (sorry Roncy, but I had to write this in English in order to puncture an unfounded assumption, - but anyway thanks for your confidence, zerothinking. That's the only way to learn a language properly. On the contrary: if Cicero and Vergilius and Thomas Aquinas and Saxo Grammaticus read my feeble and error-ridden contributions here they would rotate in their graves. Wow, Iversen, you seem to really know your Latin! Amazing stuff. Message 10 of 7028 October 2008 at 5:15am | IP Logged ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |